deck | type | name | text | cost | vps | prereq | author | Like It? | Comments | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
4074 [View] | G- | minor | Treat | This card can hold one animal. | 1F | 0 | hala | +2 8Y,6N,2?? [Vote Yes] [Vote No] | [5 Comments] last post: 2011-06-14 11:36:31 by tom |
id=2431 | Pages: [1] | ||
+2
|
COMMENTS | author | |
Treat (minor) Cost=1F, Vps=0, Prereq=none This card can hold one animal. Treat (minor) Cost=1F, Vps=0, Prereq=none This card can hold one animal. [View playtest games] [View all dealt games] |
.hala May 25, 2011 1:45am [quote] (Edit: Jun 14, 2011 2:17pm) |
||
Good idea but why the food cost? I think 1w or 1s would make more sense. Maybe add 1 point if you need to make it comparable to a stable. Good idea but why the food cost? I think 1w or 1s would make more sense. Maybe add 1 point if you need to make it comparable to a stable. | rune_ May 25, 2011 5:52am [quote] |
||
Because the card is weak. A cost of 1w for 1 animal capacity and zero points is weaker than 2w for 2 animals and 1p (Animal Yard). So I chose a smaller cost. The only smaller cost is 1f. The other option would be 1w 1animal 1p, but then it would be played more for the point than for the effect. Besides I like cards with food costs. Because the card is weak. A cost of 1w for 1 animal capacity and zero points is weaker than 2w for 2 animals and 1p (Animal Yard). So I chose a smaller cost. The only smaller cost is 1f. The other option would be 1w 1animal 1p, but then it would be played more for the point than for the effect. Besides I like cards with food costs. | hala May 25, 2011 5:56am [quote] |
||
i like the cost and no VP because it makes it more different from building a stable. i like the cost and no VP because it makes it more different from building a stable. | letsdance May 25, 2011 6:31am [quote] |
||
You can't call it a porch and have it cost 1f. You can't call it a porch and have it cost 1f. | creedofhubris Jun 14, 2011 11:26am [quote] |
||
You might call this Treat. Uwe would love the name ;). I like the card as is but also think the name doesn't fit the cost. You might call this Treat. Uwe would love the name . I like the card as is but also think the name doesn't fit the cost. | tom Jun 14, 2011 11:36am [quote] |
||
Insert: | |||
Pages: [1] |